Archive for February, 2007

The Carling Cup: Missing Diaby and Clichy, the dust-up and Arsenal player ratings

27 February 2007  |  414 Comments »
The brawl revisited

What gets me is the sheer hypocrisy. Alan Hansen said:

“Frank Lampard came in to try to calm it down but then ended up getting involved with Cesc Fabregas, who only seemed to exacerbate the situation. “

That he can claim Frank Lampard went in to calm it speaks volumes for the utter sycophancy and indulgence of the England players in this country and explains why the likes of Lampard had an ego inflated enough to think any of us would actually be interested in buying his self pitying tome. By the time Lampard arrived next to Mikel, Howard Webb had stepped in between Toure and Mikel. Lampard actually navigated his way round Webb to confront Toure, when a peacemaker would have just stood in front of his own man or dragged him away.

Look at this video frame by frame and you’ll see that even after Cesc had stepped in, Lampard still only had eyes for Kolo. I am not for a second saying Fabregas was an innocent party, but the way Lampard is depicted as some kind of saint is utterly pathetic.

Mikel was slightly unfortunate but HE did push Toure off his own volition and in a sense merited another yellow for the initial foul.

Kolo’s behaviour was, in one sense (as Andy Gray said) worthy of a yellow. But equally he must shoulder some blame for everything that happened and can not really complain about the red. Equally, as Kolo has said, Lampard should take the rap for a localised incident that was probably under control turning into a wider ruck.

It’s fair to say Adebayor got involved with more gusto than most, but the video quite clearly shows the referee had a perfect view of what he did and took no action. It suggests a case of mistaken identity and makes the linesman look truly hopeless, assuming it was he who pointed it out. On which note, Eboue (who is a prat) was barely more aggressive than anyone else but was most at fault for being stupid enough to even touch another player’s head. There are a million other ways to make your point without head contact.

Wayne Bridge, for his part, is an utter cheat who was looking for trouble in the first place and then dived pathetically before bleating on TV bleating afterwards like the anaemic, career wasting Cole back-up he is. Tell me the difference between his behaviour and what Robben was widely condemned for?

Finally, Howard Webb can not be held responsible for what happened but he was guilty of a glaring inability to read the flow of the game. Chelsea were clearly, cynically grabbing hold of every Arsenal player they could whenever there was a hint of danger as the clock wound down. They were clear bookings but Webb did nothing. It’s no excuse for the melee but it doesn’t reflect well on Webb.

Thoughts a day and a half on from the final:

-The Independent has a very interesting analysis of the melee.

-In among the concern over Terry, it was actually the Diaby injury that really cost us. We badly needed him on.

-Should Djourou have played instead of Senderos? Yes, because however steady he looks, Drogba always has a stormer against big Phil.

-Would you have taken off Walcott instead of Aliadiere? One was tiring and the other looked full of beans.

-Is Jose Mourinho the only manager to have taken a side to their first titles in forty odd years and yet done it with so little grace that the club have actually had to LOWER ticket prices to get a full house?

-I am not saying whether Mourinho was right or wrong to enter the field. But, surely, once he did, Arsene had no option but to follow.

-We badly missed Clichy against Robben. Wenger knew it and wanted his number one left back fit.

-I forgot to say yesterday that Cesc hates Fergie (pizza) and Sherringham too.

-How attacking was our midfield? Walcott and Diaby did minimal defensive work (see below) and Cesc and Denilson are predominately creative. It made for great entertainment though it probably cost us in the end.

-People are getting worried about us being perennial runners-up. I remind you of the five second place finishes in three years (three league, UEFA Cup, FA Cup) prior to the 01-02 double.

-I’m not blaming the linesman for the goal as it was impossibly close to call. But let’s be in no doubt: replays showed a non-arm part of Drogba was ahead of a non-arm part of Senderos. It’s called offside.

-Getting in and out of Cardiff was an utter joke. All London matches must never again take place there for any reason whatsoever.

-I couldn’t see a single policeman doing anything when the celery rained down on Cesc.

-Watching the game from my excellent upper tier seats, you really appreciated how great our movement was. It might make the following playa ratings fairly different from what you might have gleaned from the TV:

Almunia: Hard to judge on the first goal, very solid the rest of the time. 6.5

Hoyte: Very solid overall and did alright when faced by Lauren. His touch is so improved. 7

Senderos: Did well, but played Drogba too close to onside for the equaliser and was beaten for the winner. Always struggles against him. 6.5

Toure: Excellent during the game, he led his young charges brilliantly. One rush of blood to the head that ended up looking far worse than Kolo ever would have imagined. 7.5

Traore: He was excellent going forward, brave in the tackle and generally played well above his station. But he is still very raw (as you would expect for someone his age) and Arsene was right to have wanted the experience (!) of Clichy had he been fit. He was a key absence but full marks to Traore. 7

Walcott: Conjured a stunning goal which was celebrated in the stands like something else. Far more danger in one game than in all his other recent ones put together. But being at the game, you noticed how he struggled to support his full-back in the way Hleb and Rosicky take for granted. He tired a little and probably should have been replaced by Adebayor, with Aliadiere going left. Still, a good day. 7.5

Diaby: The good stuff in a minute, but my one criticism would have to be that he just doesn’t tackle and his tracking back is fairly poor too. Too often, Traore was offered minimal support. On the flip side at times he put in a gargantuan, Vieiraesque display. The way he turned and ran with the ball sent a shiver down the spine. 7.5

Denilson: Outstanding for around 65 minutes. We all saw the creative stuff he did, but more tellingly his positioning was just excellent and he mopped up so much before setting us on our way. Given how we dominated them for so long, I thought his reviews in the press a tad harsh. 7

Cesc: Hot headed yes, but what a player. Really ran the midfield and made Lardarse look really average. Almost scored with one fizzer. I had been sceptical about starting him but he proved me so wrong. 7.5

Baptista: The movement from the forwards in the first half made life so much easier for the midfield players and explained why we were able to tear forward at will. Still blows hot and cold and his impact diminished as the game went on but made a big contribution early on. 7

Aliadiere: I thought he was very good and Richard next to me (until recently an Aliadiere sceptic) thought him excellent. His running really was so intelligent, he was dangerous and he very rarely lost the ball. Criticised for dallying once in the first half, he had been waiting for his strike partner Baptista who had been cynically pulled back. Very unfortunate to be subbed and could have gained real joy running from the left wing against the already booked Diarra and Essien. 7.5

Neither Hleb, Adebayor or Eboue made a massive impact.

I am out the country now for ten days, during which time I have no idea whether I’ll be able to see the Blackburn, Reading and PSV games or whether I’ll feel like updating here at all. We shall see.

Chelsea 2 Arsenal 1: Arsene’s side for 2012 so very good in 2007

26 February 2007  |  1,487 Comments »
The brawl - or lack of it

This may sound crazy but 1) The brawl was not actually that bad and 2) It had little to do with Toure and Mikel and was far more about Cesc and Lampard.

I say not that bad, because there were no real punches, no real violence, just a lot of very aggressive pulling and pushing of one’s own players and the opponent’s.

If we’re honest the scrapping of Fabregas and Lampard was probably more worthy of red cards than anything Kolo or Mikel did. But that would have had to mean a dismissal for Lampard and it was symptomatic of Webb’s sycophantic refereeing that you just knew Lampard could only get a yellow, so Cesc had to escape too.

Cesc, bless him, is quite clearly a most appalling loser. And yet, his loathing’s are in impeccable taste. The boy thought Mark Hughes’ bore tactics pathetic, he despises Ashley Cole and he has nothing but contempt for Frank Lampard. What’s to disagree?

Lampard and Cesc clearly don’t get on and you wonder with Lampard whether in the back of his mind is the realisation that on the biggest stage of all last summer, the slick, smooth Fabregas was for Spain everything that the very limited Lampard wasn’t for England.

For his part, Adebayor did weigh in a little but it was hard to see how it was worse than anything else. Eboue (a grade A prat) did catch Bridge long after everyone else had calmed down and perhaps that was where the confusion with Adebayor occurred. I should say the Cashley Cole reservist milked it for all he could (and I guess it worked).

From Goodplaya at the Millennium Stadium

JOSE MOURINHO, John Terry, Andrei Shevchenko, Frank Lardarse, Peter Kenyon, Michael Ballack, Roman Abramovich, Kerry Dixon and Craig Burley: for large parts of yesterday your boys were taught one hell of a lesson.

On balance, you just about merited it in the end but for for much of it we were absolutely, utterly, entirely, completely, unremittingly, unceasingly good. If you thought Anfield or White Hart Lane had been good, this was miles better.

{}
Players from both sides rushed to
intervene when they realised there
was a risk of Lampard
toppling on top of Cesc Fabregas

There will be professional bores like radio pundit Alan Green who will try their best to have the game remembered for the injury time brawl (see right), as if they never once have erred. But to Alan I would say two things:

“1) You were verbally demolished by the caller on 606 last night who told you to get off your high horse. And rightly so. Heed his advice.

2) If you want to talk about rolemodels, fine. Let’s talk Kolo Toure. He let himself down yesterday (though not as much as the ref had you believe - see right), but with that one exception it is hard to think of a player who, given his background, his 100 per cent honesty on the pitch and infectious enthusiasm has acted as a greater inspiration or role model than Kolo Toure. So don’t even go there.”

Right, that said, I can rarely, if ever, remember seeing football played with such absolute abandon and delight. And when Theo Walcott unlocked a Chelsea side featuring the first choice strike force, midfield, central defence and goalkeeper to capitalise on our domination, I think most of us were in dreamland. It came about from (what was then an out of character) control and pass from Walcott in the first place, to which I turned to Richard and said: “That could do him good.” I was right.

Bad Luck

We continued to be excel, but not a lot went for us. Bambi like Armando Traore played above himself at left-back but Arsene had desperately been hoping Clichy would be passed fit and with the first goal and Robben’s second half running you could see why.

Also, the equaliser was mighty tight but just offside. The laws say if any part of the player (except the arms) is in front of the last defender, the man is offside and Drogba, just, was. A bitter blow.

Then when Aliadiere broke away down the right, Baptista raced forward but was cynically hauled back out of sight of the ref (and probably the camera) for a good five seconds. It was a massive chance. Then Essien was highly lucky to stay on the pitch for an awful lunge and a couple of other cynical tugs.

Even in the second half, while Terry’s knockout was clearly awful, I think most of us would happily have let Terry carry on in exchange for Diaby being fit to do so too. When others’ legs tired, his seemed to be gaining a new lease of life and when we lost him, we lost not just a vital outlet but an increasing threat too.

But in the end it was not to be. I am, of course, disappointed we didn’t win. But the funny thing is I feel little pain at seeing Chelsea victorious. Their whole existence is so skewed, so vacuous, so obscene, so wrong that seeing them celebrate elicits not jealousy but instead just a numbness.

Conclusion

Playa ratings on Monday at some point but I’ll just finish by saying how, despite an utter nightmare journey to and from Cardiff and a defeat to boot, I’m delighted I went today. I was there when it all started at West Brom and have seen four of the six games live and two on telly. It annoys me when pundits seem unable to find a medium between Arsenal the greatest team ever and Arsenal the worst thing ever, but this truly was a wonderful journey.

It was one of daring, optimism and audacity and irrespective of the result today, the side wrote a wonderful story playing some outstanding football. Of course, this won’t be the exact team in 2012 (for one thing Alex Song will have to come back in), but it’s a tribute to an extraordinary, extraordinary manager that today we watched what was, with the exception of Kolo Toure, an entirely third generational Arsenal team, make Chelsea look so very ordinary for long stretches.

We saw they are not the finished article. But the strides taken in six games since West Brom have been something to behold.

And we’re on our way…

25 February 2007  |  584 Comments »

… Or at least in five minutes I will be.

I’ll just leave you with the videos of the two Spurs semi-finals to complete our run to the final.

Enjoy.

A few thoughts before setting-off for Cardiff

24 February 2007  |  563 Comments »

MYLES PALMER makes a valid point when he says tomorrow could potentially finish in a rout for Chelsea. Remember the five goals their firsts put past our seconds at Highbury seven years ago? These things can happen.

But where I think Myles and many others are wrong is to let that fear stop them going tomorrow. As someone who attended the West Brom and Everton games, got within 20 minutes of the original Anfield one, then watched the rearranged game and the Spurs first leg on TV before going to the second leg in person, I’ve had enough fun along the route that even a spanking wouldn’t really spoil things.

And if that does happen I can guarantee you one thing: you won’t find me bemoaning the non-selection of Henry, Gallas et al. More than anything what has seen us to the final has been a spirit, an optimism that might not have been there among the established stars.

Team wise: My suspicion is Arsene will go for one first choice midfielder or one first choice striker. I suspect Gilberto could play, next to Denilson, Diaby and Walcott with Baptista and Aliadiere up front. The alternative is to play Adebayor up front, with Aliaidiere coming in from the left wing, which might suit him but would leave our wings looking massively attack minded. We shall see.

We head to Cardiff as underdogs and after years of having so much expectation on us, it’s nice in a way. In fact, my friend Richard is so relaxed that he has agreed to go for a pint before the match. He NEVER does that. The last time was before we beat Leeds 5-0 to win the title, so confident was he.

Chelsea will be utterly gutted by events at Craven Cottage. Not so much by the result but by the realisation that United evidently have the luck of Champions that they, Chelsea and we have all enjoyed in the past. It can be hard to derail. Personally, I’d love to see Chelsea overhaul them. It’s basically now or never for Fergie and he knows it. Lose this one and it’s goodbye. Chelsea on the otherhand have already won two, so three in a row won’t make much difference on the pain side for us.

And if (when?) it all falls apart for them, it won’t be a solitary runner-up spot that is responsible.

Ticket prices: What is Edelman preparing us for?

22 February 2007  |  312 Comments »

THAT BOLTON, Chelsea, Man City and now Wigan and Blackburn have announced plans to freeze or lower ticket prices should come as little surprise.

As this table illustrates, the four north-west based teams are not coming close to sell-outs. They have so many seats to fill that by lowering prices there is the scope for increased revenue.

Chelsea on the other hand are at a tipping point. Were initial success under Mourinho to prompt a surge in popularity, it would have done so by now. By effectively reducing their prices (taking into account inflation), Peter Kenyon will be hoping to lower the number of radio and newspaper adds the club need to pay for. So again, it’s revenue driven.

What does all this mean for Arsenal? Keith Edelman spoke about prices yesterday. The best lines were:

“We have always been very cautious about ticket prices, and entry ticket prices are what we look at most carefully to make sure we are affordable to everybody.
We will obviously look at the decision very carefully.
We are cognisant of the fact that football is expensive to go to for fans.
We have been one of cheapest London clubs to come to and hopefully most of our fans will agree that we produce the best product on the pitch.
We think it is still good value for money but we will be looking at the price carefully for next year.”

What does this mean? Well, Arsenal’s money men are very savvy. They had the foresight to realise 7,000 people would buy the incredibly expensive club level season tickets. They were bright enough to realise there were other people who would pay £17 more per game than the next expensive ticket for the best seats in the upper tier.

Figures such as £80 a ticket may horrify many of us, but we may as well realise there are a hell of a lot of people who watch Arsenal who have a hell of a lot of disposable income. Unless there is a serious economic downturn, charging these people £70 instead of £60 or £120 instead of £110 makes complete sense. They are subsidising the rest.

I suspect the board also realise there are a lot of fans for whom enough is rapidly becoming enough. Generally speaking, they are called the lower tier.

I predict (and I should say this is pure guesswork) rises above inflation for the priciest tickets and at no more than inflation for the cheaper ones. Feasibly, prices for some of the far back seats on the upper tier wings could also come closer in line with those in the lower tier, where I’d argue the view is often as good and the atmosphere miles better. The spaces against Blackburn may have been due to having just two days to flog the seats but they were a warning nonetheless.

Finally, I can see individual ticket prices for the best games (United, Chelsea, Spurs and glamour European games) rising because they will always sell-out. On the flip side, we may just see a small reduction for poorly scheduled TV games against average opposition.

Arseshirts