The Carling Cup: Missing Diaby and Clichy, the dust-up and Arsenal player ratings
27 February 2007 | 414 Comments »What gets me is the sheer hypocrisy. Alan Hansen said:
That he can claim Frank Lampard went in to calm it speaks volumes for the utter sycophancy and indulgence of the England players in this country and explains why the likes of Lampard had an ego inflated enough to think any of us would actually be interested in buying his self pitying tome. By the time Lampard arrived next to Mikel, Howard Webb had stepped in between Toure and Mikel. Lampard actually navigated his way round Webb to confront Toure, when a peacemaker would have just stood in front of his own man or dragged him away.
Look at this video frame by frame and you’ll see that even after Cesc had stepped in, Lampard still only had eyes for Kolo. I am not for a second saying Fabregas was an innocent party, but the way Lampard is depicted as some kind of saint is utterly pathetic.
Mikel was slightly unfortunate but HE did push Toure off his own volition and in a sense merited another yellow for the initial foul.
Kolo’s behaviour was, in one sense (as Andy Gray said) worthy of a yellow. But equally he must shoulder some blame for everything that happened and can not really complain about the red. Equally, as Kolo has said, Lampard should take the rap for a localised incident that was probably under control turning into a wider ruck.
It’s fair to say Adebayor got involved with more gusto than most, but the video quite clearly shows the referee had a perfect view of what he did and took no action. It suggests a case of mistaken identity and makes the linesman look truly hopeless, assuming it was he who pointed it out. On which note, Eboue (who is a prat) was barely more aggressive than anyone else but was most at fault for being stupid enough to even touch another player’s head. There are a million other ways to make your point without head contact.
Wayne Bridge, for his part, is an utter cheat who was looking for trouble in the first place and then dived pathetically before bleating on TV bleating afterwards like the anaemic, career wasting Cole back-up he is. Tell me the difference between his behaviour and what Robben was widely condemned for?
Finally, Howard Webb can not be held responsible for what happened but he was guilty of a glaring inability to read the flow of the game. Chelsea were clearly, cynically grabbing hold of every Arsenal player they could whenever there was a hint of danger as the clock wound down. They were clear bookings but Webb did nothing. It’s no excuse for the melee but it doesn’t reflect well on Webb.
Thoughts a day and a half on from the final:
-The Independent has a very interesting analysis of the melee.
-In among the concern over Terry, it was actually the Diaby injury that really cost us. We badly needed him on.
-Should Djourou have played instead of Senderos? Yes, because however steady he looks, Drogba always has a stormer against big Phil.
-Would you have taken off Walcott instead of Aliadiere? One was tiring and the other looked full of beans.
-Is Jose Mourinho the only manager to have taken a side to their first titles in forty odd years and yet done it with so little grace that the club have actually had to LOWER ticket prices to get a full house?
-I am not saying whether Mourinho was right or wrong to enter the field. But, surely, once he did, Arsene had no option but to follow.
-We badly missed Clichy against Robben. Wenger knew it and wanted his number one left back fit.
-I forgot to say yesterday that Cesc hates Fergie (pizza) and Sherringham too.
-How attacking was our midfield? Walcott and Diaby did minimal defensive work (see below) and Cesc and Denilson are predominately creative. It made for great entertainment though it probably cost us in the end.
-People are getting worried about us being perennial runners-up. I remind you of the five second place finishes in three years (three league, UEFA Cup, FA Cup) prior to the 01-02 double.
-I’m not blaming the linesman for the goal as it was impossibly close to call. But let’s be in no doubt: replays showed a non-arm part of Drogba was ahead of a non-arm part of Senderos. It’s called offside.
-Getting in and out of Cardiff was an utter joke. All London matches must never again take place there for any reason whatsoever.
-I couldn’t see a single policeman doing anything when the celery rained down on Cesc.
-Watching the game from my excellent upper tier seats, you really appreciated how great our movement was. It might make the following playa ratings fairly different from what you might have gleaned from the TV:
Hoyte: Very solid overall and did alright when faced by Lauren. His touch is so improved. 7
Senderos: Did well, but played Drogba too close to onside for the equaliser and was beaten for the winner. Always struggles against him. 6.5
Toure: Excellent during the game, he led his young charges brilliantly. One rush of blood to the head that ended up looking far worse than Kolo ever would have imagined. 7.5
Traore: He was excellent going forward, brave in the tackle and generally played well above his station. But he is still very raw (as you would expect for someone his age) and Arsene was right to have wanted the experience (!) of Clichy had he been fit. He was a key absence but full marks to Traore. 7
Walcott: Conjured a stunning goal which was celebrated in the stands like something else. Far more danger in one game than in all his other recent ones put together. But being at the game, you noticed how he struggled to support his full-back in the way Hleb and Rosicky take for granted. He tired a little and probably should have been replaced by Adebayor, with Aliadiere going left. Still, a good day. 7.5
Diaby: The good stuff in a minute, but my one criticism would have to be that he just doesn’t tackle and his tracking back is fairly poor too. Too often, Traore was offered minimal support. On the flip side at times he put in a gargantuan, Vieiraesque display. The way he turned and ran with the ball sent a shiver down the spine. 7.5
Denilson: Outstanding for around 65 minutes. We all saw the creative stuff he did, but more tellingly his positioning was just excellent and he mopped up so much before setting us on our way. Given how we dominated them for so long, I thought his reviews in the press a tad harsh. 7
Cesc: Hot headed yes, but what a player. Really ran the midfield and made Lardarse look really average. Almost scored with one fizzer. I had been sceptical about starting him but he proved me so wrong. 7.5
Baptista: The movement from the forwards in the first half made life so much easier for the midfield players and explained why we were able to tear forward at will. Still blows hot and cold and his impact diminished as the game went on but made a big contribution early on. 7
Aliadiere: I thought he was very good and Richard next to me (until recently an Aliadiere sceptic) thought him excellent. His running really was so intelligent, he was dangerous and he very rarely lost the ball. Criticised for dallying once in the first half, he had been waiting for his strike partner Baptista who had been cynically pulled back. Very unfortunate to be subbed and could have gained real joy running from the left wing against the already booked Diarra and Essien. 7.5
Neither Hleb, Adebayor or Eboue made a massive impact.
I am out the country now for ten days, during which time I have no idea whether I’ll be able to see the Blackburn, Reading and PSV games or whether I’ll feel like updating here at all. We shall see.

RSS
