West Ham 0 Arsenal 1: A win, but Senderos’ form worries me
30 September 2007 | 59 Comments »WHAT matters most is that we won.
We banished a run of three consecutive defeats to the Hammers. And going back to the slightly tortured by-election analysis I made earlier in the season, this was one of last season’s shock defeats that we really needed to retake.
And retake it we did thanks to Robin Van Persie’s header from Alex Hleb’s cross. Those words alone tell you how far we have come. Van Persie heading a goal was unlikely but plausible. But the idea Hleb could actually stand the ball up (as opposed to do anything other than cut the ball back along the ground) would have seemed frankly farcical last year.
On balance, we deserved to win because we controlled the game. With the exception of a ten minute spell in the second half, West Ham were dismal. It was incredible how many very basic things they screwed up very often.
We had some nice moments - in particular down the left, where Diaby put in as useful a performance as we have seen all season. On the right we struggled a little after the withdrawal of Hleb. He was replaced by Eboue, who by my reckoning has a problem. The problem is that on no particular skill does he currently look better than Hleb.
On passing, tackling, tracking back, positioning and goalscoring, the Belorussian looks the better man at the moment. Truth be told, Eboue is far too passive, far too willing to pass responsibility on to others and far too passive when he does get the ball and some way off the kind of do or die attitude we really need.
We had our chances - RVP (who had his best game for a good few weeks) cracked a post, while Adebayor, Diaby and Clichy all had decent efforts. West Ham for their part enjoyed one good spell, which culminated in our old mate Freddie scoring an absolute trademark of a goal only to have it called offside.
I’ve no idea what the rule is, but things looked fairly simple to me. If the issue was whether or not the ball came off an Arsenal player, he was onside. If the issue was his positioning when the original ball was played, he was offside. Simple as that really.
In midfield, Cesc was enterprising and worked hard without being his spectacular best. Flamini was outstanding. We’ve seen all action displays from him in the past, but yesterday seemed to combine all of that commitment and tackling with a new found savvy on the ball. He didn’t just snap in and win it - his choice of who to then give the ball to verged on Fabregassian.
Clichy, Sagna, Toure and Almunia were as solid as you would expect. Which brings us to Senderos. Without wishing to overstate the importance of this or any other blog, I can certainly say that there are times on Goodplaya when I hold back from being as forthright about a player as I might be after four or five pints in the pub.
The point is that you never know who might be reading and ultimately, we all want Arsenal to do well. So unless a player is not putting in the required effort, I’m going to steer away from being unnecessarily harsh.
But the truth is it would be remiss for me not to say anything about Phillipe Senderos. Really, I can only pay tribute to him because he appears not just to be playing but to be thriving in a parallel universe where the defensive norms of attacking the ball and winning headers appear not to apply.
The guy truly is incredible. We have conceded four goals this season and nobody could possibly hold him culpable for any. And yet, and yet, and yet. The man is a walking catastrophe at the moment. Ashton looked absolutely poo yesterday - apart from every time he and Senderos were in any kind of challenge.
I say all of this with a heavy heart because I’m loathe to pick out a single player. But I’m just not sure how much longer we can sustain it before our luck runs out. And the worry is at the moment there appear few alternatives in the squad.

RSS
